Azure environments fail audits not because Microsoft is weak, but because customers leave default settings, over-broad RBAC, unmanaged service principals and Conditional Access gaps in place. Digital Defense delivers a focused Azure security assessment aligned to CIS Azure Benchmarks, Microsoft Cloud Security Benchmark (MCSB) and CERT-In cloud guidelines.
Enterprises running primary workloads on Azure (PaaS, IaaS, AKS, App Service)
Banks and BFSI customers using Azure under RBI cloud guidelines
Microsoft 365 and Entra ID-heavy tenants needing identity-tier review
Teams using Azure DevOps, GitHub Enterprise + Azure
SaaS providers hosting customer data on Azure
Over-broad RBAC roles (Owner, Contributor) granted to humans and service principals
Conditional Access policies bypassed by legacy auth, app passwords or guest accounts
Unmanaged service principals + workload identities with high privilege
Key Vault soft-delete / purge protection off; secrets in app settings
Storage accounts with public blob containers and SAS sprawl
Defender for Cloud not configured for the right plan / scope
Subscription / management group inventory; tag and resource map.
Entra ID, Conditional Access, PIM, B2B/B2C, app registrations, service principals, workload identities.
Defender for Cloud + CIS Azure benchmark + MCSB review across all subscriptions.
VNet design, Private Endpoints, Storage, Cosmos DB, SQL, Key Vault, BYOK.
Azure DevOps / GitHub pipelines, secret scanning, IaC scanning, image scanning.
Findings + CIS/MCSB compliance matrix + remediation roadmap + Defender / Sentinel tuning playbook.
Azure subscription inventory + tag heat-map
Identity-tier review (Entra ID, CA, PIM, app registrations)
CSPM findings mapped to CIS Azure / MCSB
Network + data security findings
Defender for Cloud + Sentinel tuning playbook
Yes. M365 + Entra ID + Conditional Access + PIM is part of every Azure assessment — they're tightly coupled and most identity gaps live here.
Yes — including connector setup, KQL detection rules, analytics rule tuning, automated response playbooks and cost optimisation.
Yes — Kubernetes-specific assessment includes admission controllers, OPA/Gatekeeper, image signing, node-pool hardening, network policies and runtime protection.
CIS Azure Benchmarks, Microsoft Cloud Security Benchmark (MCSB), CERT-In cloud guidelines, RBI cloud guidance and CSA CCM.
Single-subscription mid-size: 3-4 weeks. Multi-subscription enterprise: 6-8 weeks.
cloud auditing
/services/cloud-security/cloud-auditing
AWS Cloud Security Assessment
/services/cloud-security/aws-security-assessment
Cloud Security Posture Management Consulting
/services/cloud-security/cspm-consulting
Cloud Misconfiguration Assessment
/services/cloud-security/cloud-misconfiguration-assessment
Talk to Digital Defense — India's CERT-In Empanelled cybersecurity team.
Book a consultationOnline | Typically replies instantly
Hi there! 👋 Welcome to Digital Defense. I'm here to help you with your cybersecurity needs. How can I assist you today?